<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Digital Camera File Formats: Raw and Jpeg</title> <atom:link href="http://thelightroomlab.com/2009/06/digital-camera-file-formats-raw-and-jpeg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2009/06/digital-camera-file-formats-raw-and-jpeg/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=digital-camera-file-formats-raw-and-jpeg</link> <description>TheLightroomLab.com is for professional and amateur photographers who use Adobe Photoshop Lightroom as part of their digital workflow. We have tips, tricks, tutorials, videos, news, and more.</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:33:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Lightroom 3 Now Available! &#124; TheLightroomLab.com &#124; Written by David Marx</title><link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2009/06/digital-camera-file-formats-raw-and-jpeg/comment-page-1/#comment-18427</link> <dc:creator>Lightroom 3 Now Available! &#124; TheLightroomLab.com &#124; Written by David Marx</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 04:17:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=2019#comment-18427</guid> <description>[...] I am not a paid endorser, but Lightroom 3 makes my photographs look great. I have been working with digital camera raw files since 2002 and this is truly the best image processing tool that I have ever [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I am not a paid endorser, but Lightroom 3 makes my photographs look great. I have been working with digital camera raw files since 2002 and this is truly the best image processing tool that I have ever [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lightroom 3 Now Available! &#124; TheLightroomLab.com &#124; Written by David Marx</title><link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2009/06/digital-camera-file-formats-raw-and-jpeg/comment-page-1/#comment-18428</link> <dc:creator>Lightroom 3 Now Available! &#124; TheLightroomLab.com &#124; Written by David Marx</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 04:17:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=2019#comment-18428</guid> <description>[...] I am not a paid endorser, but Lightroom 3 makes my photographs look great. I have been working with digital camera raw files since 2002 and this is truly the best image processing tool that I have ever [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I am not a paid endorser, but Lightroom 3 makes my photographs look great. I have been working with digital camera raw files since 2002 and this is truly the best image processing tool that I have ever [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: What Software Should I Add to A New Mac For Photography &#124; TheLightroomLab.com &#124; Written by David Marx</title><link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2009/06/digital-camera-file-formats-raw-and-jpeg/comment-page-1/#comment-15864</link> <dc:creator>What Software Should I Add to A New Mac For Photography &#124; TheLightroomLab.com &#124; Written by David Marx</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=2019#comment-15864</guid> <description>[...] every Apple computer, is not powerful enough to deal with the size and complexity of the modern digital camera raw file. Apple would like me to push Aperture 3 which is their professional image library and Raw file [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] every Apple computer, is not powerful enough to deal with the size and complexity of the modern digital camera raw file. Apple would like me to push Aperture 3 which is their professional image library and Raw file [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Marx</title><link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2009/06/digital-camera-file-formats-raw-and-jpeg/comment-page-1/#comment-11240</link> <dc:creator>David Marx</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:19:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=2019#comment-11240</guid> <description>Dear Mikheal,
This one is easy!  Along the toolbar, bottom of the screen just above the film strip, just change the sort order to &quot;Filename.&quot;  This will separate your jpegs from your raw files since the extension is part of the filename.
best wishes,
David</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mikheal,</p><p>This one is easy!  Along the toolbar, bottom of the screen just above the film strip, just change the sort order to &#8220;Filename.&#8221;  This will separate your jpegs from your raw files since the extension is part of the filename.</p><p>best wishes,</p><p>David</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mikhael Subotzky</title><link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2009/06/digital-camera-file-formats-raw-and-jpeg/comment-page-1/#comment-11103</link> <dc:creator>Mikhael Subotzky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:37:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=2019#comment-11103</guid> <description>Scott,
Is it possible to change the view so you see jpegs and raws retroactively once you have already imported the files? I have already imported them and done some complex re-ordering so I don&#039;t want to re-import before being able to see them separately...
Many thanks
Mikhael</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,<br
/> Is it possible to change the view so you see jpegs and raws retroactively once you have already imported the files? I have already imported them and done some complex re-ordering so I don&#8217;t want to re-import before being able to see them separately&#8230;<br
/> Many thanks<br
/> Mikhael</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scott Rouse</title><link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2009/06/digital-camera-file-formats-raw-and-jpeg/comment-page-1/#comment-6888</link> <dc:creator>Scott Rouse</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:16:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=2019#comment-6888</guid> <description>Tim,
Glad I could help.  As far as streamlining the workflow, I&#039;d recommend practicing syncing your edits on raw files rather than relying on the jpg images for your results. For example, if you shot a series of 200 images at a swim meet, most of the factors are not going to change. The lighting, color balance, etc pretty much remains the same throughout the shoot.
When I do shoots like this, I edit the first image to my satisfaction (just overall edits; no cropping, spot removal, etc) then sync those edits to the remaining 199 images. That gives me a great starting point for any minute changes I may need to make with images &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; I still get to keep the advantages of working with raw files.
Good luck,
Scott Rouse</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,</p><p>Glad I could help.  As far as streamlining the workflow, I&#8217;d recommend practicing syncing your edits on raw files rather than relying on the jpg images for your results. For example, if you shot a series of 200 images at a swim meet, most of the factors are not going to change. The lighting, color balance, etc pretty much remains the same throughout the shoot.</p><p>When I do shoots like this, I edit the first image to my satisfaction (just overall edits; no cropping, spot removal, etc) then sync those edits to the remaining 199 images. That gives me a great starting point for any minute changes I may need to make with images <em>and</em> I still get to keep the advantages of working with raw files.</p><p>Good luck,<br
/> Scott Rouse</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim Leonhardt</title><link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2009/06/digital-camera-file-formats-raw-and-jpeg/comment-page-1/#comment-6876</link> <dc:creator>Tim Leonhardt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:40:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=2019#comment-6876</guid> <description>Scott,
That&#039;s brilliant - I knew there had to be a setting somewhere!
In terms of shooting Raw+jpg - I think the biggest thing is wanting to streamline my workflow just a bit more when I&#039;ve shot several hundred photos. I get what you&#039;re saying about default presets, and may need to investigate that a bit more. But when I shoot several hundred shots at a swim meet, for instance, I like the idea of taking a look at the .jpg, deciding which are &quot;good enough,&quot; and only tweaking the raw files if I&#039;m confident I can do a better job. It&#039;s also a good way for me to grade my own eye - do I think my post-processing gives me a better result than I&#039;d get with a .jpg out of the camera?
Either way - I appreciate the perspective and the pointer to the setting. Thanks a bundle.
Tim</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p><p>That&#8217;s brilliant &#8211; I knew there had to be a setting somewhere!</p><p>In terms of shooting Raw+jpg &#8211; I think the biggest thing is wanting to streamline my workflow just a bit more when I&#8217;ve shot several hundred photos. I get what you&#8217;re saying about default presets, and may need to investigate that a bit more. But when I shoot several hundred shots at a swim meet, for instance, I like the idea of taking a look at the .jpg, deciding which are &#8220;good enough,&#8221; and only tweaking the raw files if I&#8217;m confident I can do a better job. It&#8217;s also a good way for me to grade my own eye &#8211; do I think my post-processing gives me a better result than I&#8217;d get with a .jpg out of the camera?</p><p>Either way &#8211; I appreciate the perspective and the pointer to the setting. Thanks a bundle.</p><p>Tim</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scott Rouse</title><link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2009/06/digital-camera-file-formats-raw-and-jpeg/comment-page-1/#comment-6867</link> <dc:creator>Scott Rouse</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:14:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=2019#comment-6867</guid> <description>Tim,
Thanks for your question. First of all, let me say that I understand your explanation of why you shoot in Raw+jpg, but I respectfully disagree. I recommend that photographers find a good starting place for their (raw) images in Lightroom using camera profiles or a default preset applied to images on import. I think having the jpg and raw copies of the same file is redundant and unnecessary (is it redundant to say &quot;redundant &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; unnecessary?&quot;) these days. But...I respect your choices as an individual.  :-)
Anyway...enough proselytizing...on to your question. Have you been able to import both the jpg and raw files into Lightroom? By default, Lightoom ignores jpg files next to raw files on your camera&#039;s memory card. You can change that behavior by checking the &quot;Treat JPEG files next to raw files as separate photos&quot; checkbox under the Import tab in &lt;a href=&quot;http://thelightroomlab.com/2009/05/setting-preferences-in-lightroom-2-updated-now-with-video/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lightroom&#039;s preferences&lt;/a&gt;.
When they&#039;re both in there, they should appear side by side in grid view, provided you&#039;re sorting by capture time and not filtering out raw or jpg files.
Best of luck,
Scott</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,</p><p>Thanks for your question. First of all, let me say that I understand your explanation of why you shoot in Raw+jpg, but I respectfully disagree. I recommend that photographers find a good starting place for their (raw) images in Lightroom using camera profiles or a default preset applied to images on import. I think having the jpg and raw copies of the same file is redundant and unnecessary (is it redundant to say &#8220;redundant <em>and</em> unnecessary?&#8221;) these days. But&#8230;I respect your choices as an individual. <img
src='http://thelightroomlab.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Anyway&#8230;enough proselytizing&#8230;on to your question. Have you been able to import both the jpg and raw files into Lightroom? By default, Lightoom ignores jpg files next to raw files on your camera&#8217;s memory card. You can change that behavior by checking the &#8220;Treat JPEG files next to raw files as separate photos&#8221; checkbox under the Import tab in <a
href="http://thelightroomlab.com/2009/05/setting-preferences-in-lightroom-2-updated-now-with-video/" rel="nofollow">Lightroom&#8217;s preferences</a>.</p><p>When they&#8217;re both in there, they should appear side by side in grid view, provided you&#8217;re sorting by capture time and not filtering out raw or jpg files.</p><p>Best of luck,<br
/> Scott</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim Leonhardt</title><link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2009/06/digital-camera-file-formats-raw-and-jpeg/comment-page-1/#comment-6866</link> <dc:creator>Tim Leonhardt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:44:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=2019#comment-6866</guid> <description>Hello,
I often shoot RAW+JPG using my Olympus e500 - the thought being that if I&#039;m satisfied with the camera&#039;s jpg output for a given frame, I can skip the full post-processing routine for the matching RAW file. It&#039;s also nice to compare my post-processed RAW file against the default jpg algorithm used in camera.
One problem with this strategy - I&#039;ve yet to discover how to see both files in the LR grid view displayed side-by-side. I&#039;d love to be able to use Compare view to look at my RAW file vs the camera&#039;s jpg. LR seems to recognize that I&#039;ve got RAW+jpg, but it only shows the RAW file in Grid view. I&#039;m guessing there&#039;s a simple way to show both files side-by-side, but I have not been able to figure it out. Ideas?
Thanks!
Tim Leonhardt</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>I often shoot RAW+JPG using my Olympus e500 &#8211; the thought being that if I&#8217;m satisfied with the camera&#8217;s jpg output for a given frame, I can skip the full post-processing routine for the matching RAW file. It&#8217;s also nice to compare my post-processed RAW file against the default jpg algorithm used in camera.</p><p>One problem with this strategy &#8211; I&#8217;ve yet to discover how to see both files in the LR grid view displayed side-by-side. I&#8217;d love to be able to use Compare view to look at my RAW file vs the camera&#8217;s jpg. LR seems to recognize that I&#8217;ve got RAW+jpg, but it only shows the RAW file in Grid view. I&#8217;m guessing there&#8217;s a simple way to show both files side-by-side, but I have not been able to figure it out. Ideas?</p><p>Thanks!</p><p>Tim Leonhardt</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Marx</title><link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2009/06/digital-camera-file-formats-raw-and-jpeg/comment-page-1/#comment-6819</link> <dc:creator>David Marx</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:18:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=2019#comment-6819</guid> <description>Michel-
Good point.  I actually posted a tutorial and a video on this topic just last week.  Here&#039;s the link.
http://thelightroomlab.com/2009/10/camera-raw-profiles-in-adobe-photoshop-lightroom/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michel-</p><p>Good point.  I actually posted a tutorial and a video on this topic just last week.  Here&#8217;s the link.</p><p><a
href="http://thelightroomlab.com/2009/10/camera-raw-profiles-in-adobe-photoshop-lightroom/" rel="nofollow">http://thelightroomlab.com/2009/10/camera-raw-profiles-in-adobe-photoshop-lightroom/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
