<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scott&#8217;s Photographer Holiday Gift Guide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide</link>
	<description>TheLightroomLab.com is for professional and amateur photographers who use Adobe Photoshop Lightroom as part of their digital workflow. We have tips, tricks, tutorials, videos, news, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:39:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Dave. I guess I should put my gear list together, too. I must admit, I&#039;m in the process of downsizing. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Dave. I guess I should put my gear list together, too. I must admit, I&#8217;m in the process of downsizing. <img src='http://thelightroomlab.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-231</guid>
		<description>Sorry to hop in so late here, but I thought the Canon shooters out there might be interested in my gear.  This is the stuff that I truly own and use.  These are the lenses and camera bodies that work best for me as a professional outdoor sports photographer with a limited budget. 

&lt;a href= &quot;http://www.computersforphotographers.com/2008/04/my-camera-equipment.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;My Camera Equipment&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to hop in so late here, but I thought the Canon shooters out there might be interested in my gear.  This is the stuff that I truly own and use.  These are the lenses and camera bodies that work best for me as a professional outdoor sports photographer with a limited budget. </p>
<p><a href= "http://www.computersforphotographers.com/2008/04/my-camera-equipment.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">My Camera Equipment</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ten Great Gifts for Photographers for Under $100 &#124; TheLightroomLab.com &#124; Written by Scott Rouse</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Ten Great Gifts for Photographers for Under $100 &#124; TheLightroomLab.com &#124; Written by Scott Rouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-227</guid>
		<description>[...] mentioned my favorite portable external hard drive, the somewhat-more-pricey LaCie Rugged Drive in my previous Holiday Wish List post, but I also carry one of these Western Digital Drives to use as my Time Machine backup drive on my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mentioned my favorite portable external hard drive, the somewhat-more-pricey LaCie Rugged Drive in my previous Holiday Wish List post, but I also carry one of these Western Digital Drives to use as my Time Machine backup drive on my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links - Holiday Gift Guides for the Digital Photographer &#124; User 40.0</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Links - Holiday Gift Guides for the Digital Photographer &#124; User 40.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 22:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-221</guid>
		<description>[...] TheLightroomLab.com - Scott&#8217;s Photographer Holiday Gift Guide [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TheLightroomLab.com &#8211; Scott&#8217;s Photographer Holiday Gift Guide [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marj</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>marj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 01:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Or I guess I could join a gym! Thanks Scott. Save me some sore arms and some moolah too I&#039;m guessing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or I guess I could join a gym! Thanks Scott. Save me some sore arms and some moolah too I&#8217;m guessing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 00:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-217</guid>
		<description>And, yes.  I&#039;m quite jealous!  :-)

The AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8G ED or AF Zoom- NIKKOR 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5D IF-ED would probably work out well for you.  35oz and 13oz respectively.  That 18-35mm would save you some sore arms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, yes.  I&#8217;m quite jealous!  <img src='http://thelightroomlab.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8G ED or AF Zoom- NIKKOR 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5D IF-ED would probably work out well for you.  35oz and 13oz respectively.  That 18-35mm would save you some sore arms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 00:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-216</guid>
		<description>UWA=Ultra Wide Angle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UWA=Ultra Wide Angle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marj</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>marj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 00:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, what&#039;s UWA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, what&#8217;s UWA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marj</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>marj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 00:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Wow.Lots of great input! thanks to all and I love Seshu&#039;s site! OMG! I cant wait to go back and really look at it, ( I am certain I was Indian in a previous life) I am,  and don&#039;t hate me Scott, shooting with a D700. I figured, WTH. I will definitely grow into this camera, not out of it. I want to be able to do professional interiors and architectural as well as funky portrait work. I wanted to see if speed on a wide angle (when I can use an iso of 1600 easily without much grain) is really necessary. I do figure it will be used on tripod for interiors but for evening wedding receptions, it will be my bare hands. They are, by the way, having difficulty holding up a d700 by the end of the evening so weight of lens is a consideration, not a deal breaker, just a consideration. All these lens purchases are now business decisions so I am wringing my hands about spending 1600 to make income if I can make the same income with a less expensive lens. Comments appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.Lots of great input! thanks to all and I love Seshu&#8217;s site! OMG! I cant wait to go back and really look at it, ( I am certain I was Indian in a previous life) I am,  and don&#8217;t hate me Scott, shooting with a D700. I figured, WTH. I will definitely grow into this camera, not out of it. I want to be able to do professional interiors and architectural as well as funky portrait work. I wanted to see if speed on a wide angle (when I can use an iso of 1600 easily without much grain) is really necessary. I do figure it will be used on tripod for interiors but for evening wedding receptions, it will be my bare hands. They are, by the way, having difficulty holding up a d700 by the end of the evening so weight of lens is a consideration, not a deal breaker, just a consideration. All these lens purchases are now business decisions so I am wringing my hands about spending 1600 to make income if I can make the same income with a less expensive lens. Comments appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rested Traveler</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Rested Traveler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-213</guid>
		<description>Mine is the Sigma 10-20mm EX DC.  It&#039;s a whole lot of UWA bang for the buck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mine is the Sigma 10-20mm EX DC.  It&#8217;s a whole lot of UWA bang for the buck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Cross</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-212</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Scott!  Every shot in the set you &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jeffcrossphoto.com/www/2008/11/09/keeping-it-real/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;linked to above&lt;/a&gt; was shot with the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L.  I love this wide angle, short range zoom and have it on my camera 90% of the time... The other 10% I am shooting with the Canon wide angle EF 28mm f/1.8 USM.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Scott!  Every shot in the set you <a href="http://www.jeffcrossphoto.com/www/2008/11/09/keeping-it-real/" rel="nofollow">linked to above</a> was shot with the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L.  I love this wide angle, short range zoom and have it on my camera 90% of the time&#8230; The other 10% I am shooting with the Canon wide angle EF 28mm f/1.8 USM.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Really depends how wide you need to go and what body you&#039;re working with (ie crop sensor or full frame) but I&#039;ve been using a Sigma 20mm f/1.8 for the last few years and it&#039;s my go to wideangle lens. However as I&#039;m using an EOS 20D I&#039;ve been investigating the Sigma wide zooms for the extra range. Both the 10-20mm f/4-5.6 and 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 seem well regarded from the reviews I&#039;ve read as is the Tokina 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 if you don&#039;t mind trading range for speed.

There&#039;s quite a lot of choice in this end of the market so it&#039;s best if you decide what your range, speed and price perameters are and then go review hunting (fredmiranda.com being a good place to pick up consumer reviews of lenses)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really depends how wide you need to go and what body you&#8217;re working with (ie crop sensor or full frame) but I&#8217;ve been using a Sigma 20mm f/1.8 for the last few years and it&#8217;s my go to wideangle lens. However as I&#8217;m using an EOS 20D I&#8217;ve been investigating the Sigma wide zooms for the extra range. Both the 10-20mm f/4-5.6 and 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 seem well regarded from the reviews I&#8217;ve read as is the Tokina 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 if you don&#8217;t mind trading range for speed.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s quite a lot of choice in this end of the market so it&#8217;s best if you decide what your range, speed and price perameters are and then go review hunting (fredmiranda.com being a good place to pick up consumer reviews of lenses)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Harrison</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>John Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Scott - thanks for posting the question on twitter!

I use the Sigma 10-20mm DX lens with my Nikon D300 so the effective range is 15mm-40mm.  I have been VERY happy with it - great price/performance range.  The Nikon 12-24 would be great but it is 2X the price.  Of course, if someone wants to give me a Nikon 14-24 or a PC/tilt shift lens, I will gladly except it!! Wide angles are great for distorting near perspective subjects. Here is one good example.  [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jharrisonphoto.com/photos/289942249_yxo4s-M.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.jharrisonphoto.com/photos/289942249_yxo4s-M.jpg&lt;/a&gt;]

Cheers,
John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott &#8211; thanks for posting the question on twitter!</p>
<p>I use the Sigma 10-20mm DX lens with my Nikon D300 so the effective range is 15mm-40mm.  I have been VERY happy with it &#8211; great price/performance range.  The Nikon 12-24 would be great but it is 2X the price.  Of course, if someone wants to give me a Nikon 14-24 or a PC/tilt shift lens, I will gladly except it!! Wide angles are great for distorting near perspective subjects. Here is one good example.  [<a href="http://www.jharrisonphoto.com/photos/289942249_yxo4s-M.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.jharrisonphoto.com/photos/289942249_yxo4s-M.jpg</a>]</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jeff. All are welcome...Canon, Nikon, or other!  :-)  I&#039;m not sure I remember which brand Marj shoots.

Loving the saturated, high-fashion look of the shots on your site. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jeffcrossphoto.com/www/2008/11/09/keeping-it-real/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;These are my favorite.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jeff. All are welcome&#8230;Canon, Nikon, or other!  <img src='http://thelightroomlab.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   I&#8217;m not sure I remember which brand Marj shoots.</p>
<p>Loving the saturated, high-fashion look of the shots on your site. <a href="http://www.jeffcrossphoto.com/www/2008/11/09/keeping-it-real/" rel="nofollow">These are my favorite.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Mike. The example images are a big help. They look great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Mike. The example images are a big help. They look great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Cross</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Coming in from &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/TheLightroomLab/status/1040753179&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this tweet&lt;/a&gt; and now I see this is probably aimed more at Nikon users, but even on the Canon side, I use the Canon 17-40 f/4L.  Not as fast as the f/2.8 lenses discussed here but I normally shoot with multiple strobes.  Anyway, the 17-35 f/2.8 sounds like a great piece of glass!

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming in from <a href="http://twitter.com/TheLightroomLab/status/1040753179" rel="nofollow">this tweet</a> and now I see this is probably aimed more at Nikon users, but even on the Canon side, I use the Canon 17-40 f/4L.  Not as fast as the f/2.8 lenses discussed here but I normally shoot with multiple strobes.  Anyway, the 17-35 f/2.8 sounds like a great piece of glass!</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Seshu, for the input.

By the way, people, have you seen Seshu&#039;s wedding photography? Very nice!  Check it out at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seshu.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.seshu.net/&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Seshu, for the input.</p>
<p>By the way, people, have you seen Seshu&#8217;s wedding photography? Very nice!  Check it out at <a href="http://www.seshu.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.seshu.net/</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Panic</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Panic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-205</guid>
		<description>My current wide angle lense of choice has be rather spoiled, 12-24 Sigma mounted on a 5d, so yes, I get 12mm with nearly no vignette on a full frame sensor.  Examples can be seen here: http://www.mikepanic.com/bee/ - many of those were shot with the 12-24, the rest were shot with 70-200 f/4L IS

One day I&#039;ll afford and buy a 16-35L lens, for now, I really enjoy the Sigma. 

For the Nikon users out there, it&#039;s really hard to beat the 14-24 f/2.8 lens, I had the chance to shoot it strapped on a D3, photos are here: http://www.mikepanic.com/skateboard-sequence/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My current wide angle lense of choice has be rather spoiled, 12-24 Sigma mounted on a 5d, so yes, I get 12mm with nearly no vignette on a full frame sensor.  Examples can be seen here: <a href="http://www.mikepanic.com/bee/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mikepanic.com/bee/</a> &#8211; many of those were shot with the 12-24, the rest were shot with 70-200 f/4L IS</p>
<p>One day I&#8217;ll afford and buy a 16-35L lens, for now, I really enjoy the Sigma. </p>
<p>For the Nikon users out there, it&#8217;s really hard to beat the 14-24 f/2.8 lens, I had the chance to shoot it strapped on a D3, photos are here: <a href="http://www.mikepanic.com/skateboard-sequence/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mikepanic.com/skateboard-sequence/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seshu</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Seshu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-204</guid>
		<description>I use the 17-35mm f/2.8. Yes, it is heavy and is quite a workout, but that&#039;s the price you have to pay for great glass to create great images. I don&#039;t like to skimp on quality gear. Would love a D700 but for what I do the D300s are extremely good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the 17-35mm f/2.8. Yes, it is heavy and is quite a workout, but that&#8217;s the price you have to pay for great glass to create great images. I don&#8217;t like to skimp on quality gear. Would love a D700 but for what I do the D300s are extremely good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-203</guid>
		<description>As a Nikon shooter, I&#039;ll just cover the Nikon realm. Maybe Dave will chime in with his suggestions for the Canon shooters out there.

My wide angle zoom is the Nikon 17-35mm f/2.8 AF-S ED-IF lens.  It&#039;s priced just shy of $1,500 from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00005LEOS?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=lrlab-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00005LEOS&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Amazon.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=lrlab-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B00005LEOS&quot; width=&quot;1&quot; height=&quot;1&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;border:none !important; margin:0px !important;&quot; /&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/186250-USA/Nikon_1960_AF_S_Zoom_Nikkor_17_35mm.html/BI/2798/KBID/3723&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;B&amp;H Photo&lt;/a&gt;.

I was very happy with it when I had my F100 film body, but on my smaller-sensor D2x, it just doesn&#039;t go wide enough for me.  Many people have solved this issue with the &quot;digital-only&quot; Super Wide Angle AF 12-24mm f/4G ED-IF AF-S DX Zoom. It&#039;s around $850 from either &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000092M1T?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=lrlab-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B000092M1T&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Amazon.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=lrlab-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B000092M1T&quot; width=&quot;1&quot; height=&quot;1&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;border:none !important; margin:0px !important;&quot; /&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/277227-USA/Nikon_2144_12_24mm_f_4G_ED_IF_DX.html/BI/2798/KBID/3723&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;B&amp;H&lt;/a&gt;. The problem here, of course, is that it will only work on Nikons with what they call their &quot;DX-Format&quot; sensor. The new larger sensor on cameras such as the D700 and D3, the &quot;FX-Format&quot; sensor, is the same size as 35mm film so these DX lenses won&#039;t work properly on them.

One of the other problems with the 17-35mm f/2.8 is that it&#039;s pretty heavy. I went all out years ago and bought a D2x, 17-35mm f/2.8, 24-70mm f2.8, and 70-200mm f2.8.  That combination has proven too heavy for me lug around. I&#039;d really like a full-frame Nikon D700 and a lighter, more versatile lens such as the AF-S VR Zoom 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED. It&#039;s less than $500 at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00009VQG6?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=lrlab-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00009VQG6&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Amazon.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=lrlab-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B00009VQG6&quot; width=&quot;1&quot; height=&quot;1&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;border:none !important; margin:0px !important;&quot; /&gt;. It&#039;s not a really wide angle lens, but I think it would make a nice travel lens.

I haven&#039;t really kept up with the third-party market lenses such as those from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/category/5545/Sigma.html/BI/2798/KBID/3723&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sigma&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/category/6967/Tamron.html/BI/2798/KBID/3723&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tamron&lt;/a&gt;. Both of these companies have some high-quality products and will be something I&#039;ll seriously consider when I&#039;m ready to purchase.

Hope that helps.

Anyone else?  Feel free to chime in with your favorites.

-Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Nikon shooter, I&#8217;ll just cover the Nikon realm. Maybe Dave will chime in with his suggestions for the Canon shooters out there.</p>
<p>My wide angle zoom is the Nikon 17-35mm f/2.8 AF-S ED-IF lens.  It&#8217;s priced just shy of $1,500 from <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00005LEOS?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=lrlab-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B00005LEOS" rel="nofollow">Amazon.com</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=lrlab-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B00005LEOS" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> or <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/186250-USA/Nikon_1960_AF_S_Zoom_Nikkor_17_35mm.html/BI/2798/KBID/3723" rel="nofollow">B&#038;H Photo</a>.</p>
<p>I was very happy with it when I had my F100 film body, but on my smaller-sensor D2x, it just doesn&#8217;t go wide enough for me.  Many people have solved this issue with the &#8220;digital-only&#8221; Super Wide Angle AF 12-24mm f/4G ED-IF AF-S DX Zoom. It&#8217;s around $850 from either <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000092M1T?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=lrlab-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B000092M1T" rel="nofollow">Amazon.com</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=lrlab-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B000092M1T" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> or <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/277227-USA/Nikon_2144_12_24mm_f_4G_ED_IF_DX.html/BI/2798/KBID/3723" rel="nofollow">B&#038;H</a>. The problem here, of course, is that it will only work on Nikons with what they call their &#8220;DX-Format&#8221; sensor. The new larger sensor on cameras such as the D700 and D3, the &#8220;FX-Format&#8221; sensor, is the same size as 35mm film so these DX lenses won&#8217;t work properly on them.</p>
<p>One of the other problems with the 17-35mm f/2.8 is that it&#8217;s pretty heavy. I went all out years ago and bought a D2x, 17-35mm f/2.8, 24-70mm f2.8, and 70-200mm f2.8.  That combination has proven too heavy for me lug around. I&#8217;d really like a full-frame Nikon D700 and a lighter, more versatile lens such as the AF-S VR Zoom 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED. It&#8217;s less than $500 at <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00009VQG6?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=lrlab-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B00009VQG6" rel="nofollow">Amazon.com</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=lrlab-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B00009VQG6" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />. It&#8217;s not a really wide angle lens, but I think it would make a nice travel lens.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t really kept up with the third-party market lenses such as those from <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/category/5545/Sigma.html/BI/2798/KBID/3723" rel="nofollow">Sigma</a> and <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/category/6967/Tamron.html/BI/2798/KBID/3723" rel="nofollow">Tamron</a>. Both of these companies have some high-quality products and will be something I&#8217;ll seriously consider when I&#8217;m ready to purchase.</p>
<p>Hope that helps.</p>
<p>Anyone else?  Feel free to chime in with your favorites.</p>
<p>-Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marj</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>marj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-202</guid>
		<description>So what would be/is your wide angle zoom of choice????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what would be/is your wide angle zoom of choice????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David&#8217;s Holiday Gift Guide for Digital Photographers &#124; TheLightroomLab.com &#124; Written by David Marx</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>David&#8217;s Holiday Gift Guide for Digital Photographers &#124; TheLightroomLab.com &#124; Written by David Marx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-199</guid>
		<description>[...] set out to write a simple holiday gift guide like the one that my buddy Scott Rouse posted recently. I started out trying to make a list of goodies that any serious digital photographer might want, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] set out to write a simple holiday gift guide like the one that my buddy Scott Rouse posted recently. I started out trying to make a list of goodies that any serious digital photographer might want, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-198</guid>
		<description>The D3X looks cool, but I&#039;m looking to downsize. I&#039;m tired of carrying that giant D2X around! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The D3X looks cool, but I&#8217;m looking to downsize. I&#8217;m tired of carrying that giant D2X around! <img src='http://thelightroomlab.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arno</title>
		<link>http://thelightroomlab.com/2008/12/scotts-photographer-holiday-gift-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Arno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelightroomlab.com/?p=1062#comment-197</guid>
		<description>Heh... Not going cheap, are we?
D700... Pfff!
How about...

http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/15/24-4-megapixel-nikon-d3x-dslr-in-the-works/


;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh&#8230; Not going cheap, are we?<br />
D700&#8230; Pfff!<br />
How about&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/15/24-4-megapixel-nikon-d3x-dslr-in-the-works/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/15/24-4-megapixel-nikon-d3x-dslr-in-the-works/</a></p>
<p> <img src='http://thelightroomlab.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
